Manual & Time-Consuming
Spreadsheets, scattered evidence, and endless chasing consume your team's time.
Assessments that fill themselves in. Ratings that move when reality moves. Both on the same vendor, reconciled — because your third parties should not be your weakest link.
Spreadsheets, scattered evidence, and endless chasing consume your team's time.
You cannot manage what you cannot see. Gaps in monitoring leave you exposed.
FCA, DORA, NIS2, ISO 27001 — the demands keep growing. Non-compliance is not an option.
Direct attention to critical vendors first, while automation keeps the rest under control.
A security rating tells you what an attacker can see. A questionnaire tells you what the vendor says. Neither is the answer on its own — and the gap between them is usually the finding worth acting on.
SOC 2 reports, ISO 27001 certificates, policies, trust centres. More than 70% of the questionnaire is pre-filled against 157 universal controls before the vendor ever sees it.
Continuous outside-in scoring of the vendor’s live external posture — exposed infrastructure, certificate and email configuration, breach and dark-web signal.
Where a vendor’s answer and their observable posture disagree, that contradiction is surfaced rather than averaged away. It is the finding a single-signal platform cannot produce.
Your team reviews structured output instead of chasing answers.
See how assessments workReplace fragmented processes with one platform built for continuous oversight, faster onboarding, and audit-ready assurance.